This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Lmao
Two yeets*
Wait Badger played in Champs? Which year was it?
I forgot Val was on that team and is also playing here
Reading this again, and assuming that yesterday's save on BN was done by purple, it sounds like reds may have tried to make one of them vote immune and possibly got stopped.
That's what I would have done.
Or rather after a successful yeet in F5
My understanding is that this is the "this is true or I'm mafia" type of situation
He's claiming to have you confirmed as purple
I had a role read on Foxxi from early in D1 but I have no idea if that was right or wrong lol
I'm fact I think there's a good chance that the mafia team here are just the people who were mafia in that game minus myself :D
Hey, it's progress.
Sorry, just remember you had already answered that.
If yesterday's shenanigans were indeed a purple action then it seems unlikely to me that Badger's done it.
Or rather this part is what I was referring to thinking it could have caused the votes on Blind Ninja to be cancelled. But seeing as this is from N3 then maybe not?
Actually, I think that "stole the show with their shocking announcement" might be referring to it being a purple action. Could be a day action or even a part of lightning rod action N2, which just said that 2.5 hours (or however long it was) the top lead wagon would become vote immine.
Well, without knowing whose action it was exactly, I don't think scum would have done it if Badger was on their team. I think the first paragraph of the night post might suggest it was a red action though.
Well, my reads on you and Badger ARE different. I don't actually view his stunt yesterday as scummy even. It just sounds like he thought he was onto something and talking himself into it. And I liked his engagement otherwise. But having a scum read on you doesn't mean not giving you the benefit of the doubt.
What made you think I wasn't willing yo give you the benefit of the doubt? I came into D3 suspecting you very heavily but I wasn't saying "BN is 100% scum". I was saying that IF scum were trying to save Claws then your play on D3 fit that description. But the possibility remained for me that you were town. I took the day to watch and see which person in my 4-person Poe I wanted to end up on. And even voted Tildey for the large part of the day.
Sounds like it is info from your role.
Is it info from your role on Badger or was it your inference from the mod posts?
For the record, Grumpy told people to ignore his N2 result. Do you think Jarrod used the lightning rod to pull Grumpy's action onto him?
I can see it as a possibility that Badger's purple. I don't think he is red given that he was the counter wagon to Blind Ninja, who is very likely a red and was saved yesterday.
At this point I'm just praying wolves will shoot you by the time you come around to yeeting me so I will hopefully have a better chance of convincing more reasonable people.
Call someone evil long enough, and they'll make an honest person out of you.
Why would I vote to remove one of the few people that won't just vote me later when all the wolves are gone
I buy it. I came into D3 thinking BN was very likely to be mafia. So it didn't take much to convince me.
Once again
lol
You have put me in your bottom pile along with Future and BN who you are trying to kill to today. My assumption is that same tier means similar feelings.
Alright, let me actually address this point by point.
Well, the alternative would be that I actually was just meme pushing Void... Which seemed like such an insane idea to me that I couldn't imagine that anyone would actually think that I was doing that and that I needed to clarify that yes, my vote indeed represented a real read. Just call it a cultural difference, I guess?
Let me put it this way. The only game where I actually saw you as mafia was a game on MU some 2-3 years ago which I was checking a couple of times while you were playing. In that game you were completely frozen and sad as mafia. So despite never actually playing with scum you in a game I always sort of written you off as a polarized player. Sometimes I have some paranoia about you very early in the game (as I remind you I also had paranoia about you here on D1) but I always have the townread on you by 2/3 into D1 at the latest. I dare you to refer me to a game where this has not been the case and I was town.
You have completely misread the tone of that remark. The way I meant it was more like, hey Foxxi, so it looks like you'll be getting your way here, can we be friends again? As I have been saying, I did not care about our argument nearly as much as you did.
My discussion was an open invitation for anyone to weigh in. I do not typically go around asking everybody "hey mate what do you think about xyz"
What would be the scum motivation for me to walk away from defending Claws? I may as well have committed to the defense at this point, especially since you were giving me a pass at the time by saying you understood my pov. I don't see any reason why I would be more likely to give up on my defense as mafia than as town.
You must have missed me saying that I thought you raised some reasonable points about how my townread on Claws may have been misguided, then. When you pointed out that Claws never actually proved that he had the same reasons for scumreading Void that I did and that I was effectively vibing with him over the lack of explanation I started doubting my own read. If you go back, you'll see that I stopped responding to you shortly after that. That was because I was weakened in my belief in that moment but wasn't ready to admit it due to wanting to see others weigh in first.
Well, is everything else I've done that doesn't have anything to do with Void or Claws just white noise to you then?
No shit Foxxi. I've outlined what seems to be pretty much the consensus poe today, earlier than anyone else did.
Sad times
I don't know about that lol I tend to expect wolves in hard positions to just roll over and die but maybe that's just me
Oh boy.
Part of why I voted Tildey was because I sensed you wanted to vote differently.
I see no need for us to come to a consensus this early in the day. Just vote whoever you want. Then everyone can pick between the options.
True, but I think you have redeeming points and I will argue I do too.
I pretty much outlined it in the post you are quoting.
Didn't die*
Well, we now know that Foxxi was right about Claws and didn't for so I'm not sure how much I still believe this myself tbh
What is this in response to?
I'm not terribly in the mood to "start" anything to be honest. I've outlined my thoughts as to which group of players should be the main subject of scrutiny for the next couple of days. Beyond that I'm just looking to hear what everyone else has to say.
That's wonderful to know!
Yeah it sounds like it could be a consequence of Claws death
Oh no
I thought that was his implication that scum did it
I wrote this post not long after waking up lol
Uh I clearly meant "Claws wagon" not "Drey wagon" lol
I wouldn't describe your defence as "hard" tbh
EBWOP
I think that depending on the exact number of the scum and whether or not you count the lone 3p neutral the odds of one of three people containing a scum are somewhat close. Though it's definitely less than 50% if one is town and counts themselves among that number.
Foxxi's, I promise you that what you are feeling about me is exactly what I'm feeling about you right now. Well, minus the want to bash your head against the wall.
And now that you did, the scum might just decide to play their cards accordingly.
The day is far from ended.