Recent content by Matthieu

Listo95 said:

Woulda liked if you had chatted with me once or twice during those early days.

Click to expand...

I tried! Internet was very spotty during the first couple of days due to a storm.

Thanks for the game! Sorry for poisoning you almost every night phase, @PsychoSoldier

3puppies said:

This reads terribly scummy. The second guessing is coming from people that have all been killed.

Click to expand...

Blind Ninja isn't dead...

I'm increasingly confident that NQM is the correct target and this convenient second guessing is a hail mary attempt to try and save her.

Claws said:

Did you want a chat i tryed asking earlier

Click to expand...

I do, yes.

Vote: Yes

I'm much more suspicious of NQM than BN for whatever that is worth.

Yeah, I agree that we should get a claim from NQM. Going to go re-read the thread right away.

GrumpyCat said:

Not sure how would taking someout for inactivity be anything beneficial to the mod.

Click to expand...

Call it a hunch. I have no real evidence to support it beyond a gut feeling, but we've certainly had games before where someone on a scum team has just cruised by during the day phases and causing trouble at night without ever really being held accountable.

Beyond that, since the player in question isn't contributing at all then if we do take someone else out today and go into the next day phase, it leaves us in a significantly weaker position if the trend continues.

3puppies said:

Who do you suggest we take out? Is there a reason you did not vote for Psycho - when even he agreed that we need information and he was willing to vote himself?

Click to expand...

NQM.

Hasn't made a single post (unless I'm mistaken), yet is almost certainly doing something at night since she hasn't been taken out for inactivity. Everybody else has different degrees of activity to at least be bringing something to the table.

I'm not really feeling either Psycho or Claws as the way to go. Neither of them have come across as particularly suspicious to me this time around.

Does it not make more sense to take out someone who is not contributing at all? Along with that, I will say I am genuinely surprised that I was not taken out as Blind Ninja wasn't wrong to criticise my lack of meaningful contribution so far.

Blind Ninja said:

I havent played in months either... has your goal just been "survival" and not engagement?

Click to expand...

My goal was to serve as bait, which is also why I didn't want to take part in a mass claim as it would gut my role's effectiveness considerably.

Blind Ninja said:

Hard to look elsewhere, when you are sitting back and doing nothing. No attempts to solve. This feels like "let me claim something nobody else has so far"

Click to expand...

Yeah, I haven't brought much to the table because I haven't played in months and this is a pretty complex game. My role is also passive, so I have leaned into that.

Look elsewhere, please.

I'm the Soldier.

I admit I do not have any meaningful information to bring to the table, so if you really want to get rid of me...well, I'm not going to waste too much time putting up a heavy resistance.

Vote: No

Psycho is a very good player. From what I recall, he can overlook the early game only to show up a bit later and lock in. So I am hoping for that.

If I were going to vote on the basis of being quiet, I'd be a hypocrite as I am finding my own feet again after some time away...but in addition to that, there's other players who fit that category.

So, eh...

Listo95 said:

Also I'd like to request a chat with @Matthieu

Click to expand...

Sure! Why, though?