This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Well, either you're lying or someone is trying to redirect your night actions elsewhere without it appearing in the write-up.
It is strange, though if I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt then I'd expect you to do the same for me. I wouldn't avoid taking out an obvious threat to my team if I were scum - and that's something that bothers me about Crackle's attempts to paint me as scum based on my vote record. It wouldn't make sense for me to deliberately avoid yeeting scum if I were just going to let them get slaughtered at night.
I think he's town, though I don't expect him to actively try and solve given how quiet he's been in general since his return to the game. I wouldn't resist pushing on him today since looking back at Morrison's three posts there really isn't much to go on there and that's the slot he took over.
I don't have any reason to doubt that Psycho is who he says he is. So, yes, when Psycho has successfully played a major part in taking three different scum scalps as trophies then I find it very strange that you're apparently so eager to get rid of him.
Xanjori and Llettuce.
...?
Psycho doesn't have a team. He's third party and he did kill scum during the night.
Agreed with this. There could be day kills or day restrictions in play, so if you have something to say...just say it. Even if there's no danger afoot then at least it extends the amount of time people have to digest and weigh in on it.
I don't follow. What about my immunity? I just got lucky to be picked as the winner.
Given the size of the game and the very likely chance of not being able to find whoever the player in question is, I doubt that the game will end once Exodia attains another two kills. I suspect it's similar to the Blind Ninja situation and it's just a third party role in play that has its own unique win condition.
With multiple inactive players, it could very well be the case for the timer to run its full course.
I don't know either, mate.
Why do I do anything that I do?
Why? Does it make you mad?
Seven, not four. BN posted a list of names earlier on in the thread.
She's a consistently good player, yes - though has an unfortunate habit of being killed off early/hit with restrictions precisely because of that.
I feel a lot of better about both of them, actually. Rock's likely not scum since I think scum would be more cautious when it comes to making wishes as to avoid wasting them so they can try and benefit their team. Getting frustrated at me or just joking around and wasting the wishes isn't a terrible reaction.
It's outlined as a rule for wishes in the start of day post...
Surely if they weren't aligned it'd make more sense to just use different colours to signify that they're separate entities?
I read it as purely being flavour text. Ultimately Val was killed by yellow so I find it unlikely that Val, himself, is a yellow aligned player.
It's awesome because it's awesome because Val is coming back.
Seven? That's definitely something to be concerned about, especially if they keep it up.
Not particularly, no. He's playing much as I would expect him to as town and the simple fact that he cast a vote for me after working out how the secondary D1 mechanic worked served to draw attention to him - something I really don't see him doing as scum.
I want them both gone. Doesn't matter which is the 'bigger' threat, since 'bigger threat' doesn't always line up with 'most competent threat'.
I don't see how either of these actually benefit anyone.
Because I like to get reactions out of people to see what I have to work with.
You're assuming that my wish is even chosen in the first place.
You can't vote for me this day phase.
You might be a rock but I can't get a solid read on you.
I don't think he's red and we can safely rule him out as being yellow. I also dislike it when the same player is targeted two games in a row, since that makes it even less likely for someone to be inclined to contribute.
...but I just explained my reasoning for Val in a recent post.
How so? I'm curious to see where it leads. Windward and Rock are both very 'brash', I suppose. I thought it was very interesting that they happened to align with the same target. It's a good way to either condemn them both if Future flips town or alleviate concerns about potential scum slips/backtracking if he flips scum.
I'm decent at reading him.
Could it be tied to the wishes, somehow? Maybe you can't cast one?