Listo95
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2023
- Messages
- 1,147
One of Foxxi's posts essentially said we have at least 1 of Fool, Scorned, Apostle. Assuming Jack's is true also that means 2 of any combo of those 3.Please no, not the other languages again.
One of Foxxi's posts essentially said we have at least 1 of Fool, Scorned, Apostle. Assuming Jack's is true also that means 2 of any combo of those 3.Please no, not the other languages again.
pourquoi faut-il que ce soit un imbécile ? il y a deux autres possibilités ? De plus, le comportement de Jack pourrait absolument être celui d'un imbécile, mais c'est aussi un peu normal pour lui, alors *hausse les épaules*I am like there has to be a Fool this game but so far didn't notice anyone that really wants to get yeeted :>
The OP said this is a cult style game. Maybe he ran with that then?Future was saying this is a Cult game and to toss out all the Unseen roles -- so my point is that if this turns out to BE an unseen game it's unlikely future began as Unseen.
Well. It looks like someone has already decided that I should shut up, lmaoEh bien. Il semble que quelqu'un ait déjà décidé que je dois me taire, lmao
So we have at least one of the following: despised, fool, or worship with an apostle.Nous avons donc au moins l'un des éléments suivants : méprisé, imbécile ou culte avec un apôtre.
Je pense un peu que Jack fait n'importe quoi en réponse à ma restriction. La probabilité qu'il y ait deux de ces rôles qui traînent sur le fil, et l'un m'a frappé, puis l'autre a immédiatement décidé de frapper les griffes avec exactement la même chose aussi - me semble mince.
why does he have to be a fool? are there two other possibilities? Also, Jack's behavior could absolutely be that of a jerk, but that's also kind of normal for him, so *shrugs*pourquoi faut-il que ce soit un imbécile ? il y a deux autres possibilités ? De plus, le comportement de Jack pourrait absolument être celui d'un imbécile, mais c'est aussi un peu normal pour lui, alors *hausse les épaules*
Pouah. putain de. autour. Pas jack n'est foiré. et dans le. fil de discussion. pas dans le fil.I kind of think Jack is messing up in response to my restriction. The likelihood of there being two of these roles lying around on the wire, and one hitting me, and then the other immediately deciding to hit the claws with the exact same thing too - seems slim to me.
i love how you overanalyze everything, makes my head hurt and questions my own alignmentIt's a combination of not liking the light sus on future while I'm actively saying I think that post could point to him as town since it seems like a strange thing for scum to say/do even if this is a Cult game, and if it's Unseen then it's even less likely he's part of that. And then pointing out *why* he might be assuming it's cult is just not a good town move. Not necessarily a scum move either, but I dislike it.
c'est le capitaine jack sparrow pour toiJe pense un peu que Jack fait n'importe quoi en réponse à ma restriction. La probabilité qu'il y ait deux de ces rôles qui traînent sur le fil, et l'un m'a frappé, puis l'autre a immédiatement décidé de frapper les griffes avec exactement la même chose aussi - me semble mince.
They got hit with a restriction.
True. I tend to agree with this that I am not sold on him being restricted.Eh bien, j'ai été touché par une restriction. Je ne suis pas vendu sur Jack. Il n'y a qu'un total de trois rôles qui pourraient le faire. Max. Et cela suppose que nous ayons une culte. Sinon ce n'est que deux : méprisé et imbécile. Et cela signifierait qu'ils auraient tous deux été choisis au hasard comme rôles dans ce jeu, ET tous les deux présents et attentifs à me frapper, puis Jack juste après. Et même si nous avons un culte pour en faire un potentiel de trois, le rôle qui commence par le chef de culte est aléatoire, donc un culte ne signifierait pas automatiquement qu'il y a un apôtre.
Il me semble juste peu probable que j'aie été touché par un et qu'un deuxième se soit trouvé là pour voir et ait ensuite décidé de faire exactement la même chose à Jack.
They are two different groups. You can see the breakdown of the roles in the discord server.What is the difference between cult and unseen?
Well, I was hit with a restriction. I'm not sold on Jack. There are only a total of three roles that could do this. Max. And that assumes we have a cult. Otherwise it's only two: despised and imbecile. And that would mean that they would both have been randomly chosen as roles in this game, AND both present and intent on hitting me, and then Jack right after. And even if we have a cult to make it a potential three, the role that starts with the cult leader is random, so a cult wouldn't automatically mean there's an apostle.Eh bien, j'ai été touché par une restriction. Je ne suis pas vendu sur Jack. Il n'y a qu'un total de trois rôles qui pourraient le faire. Max. Et cela suppose que nous ayons une culte. Sinon ce n'est que deux : méprisé et imbécile. Et cela signifierait qu'ils auraient tous deux été choisis au hasard comme rôles dans ce jeu, ET tous les deux présents et attentifs à me frapper, puis Jack juste après. Et même si nous avons un culte pour en faire un potentiel de trois, le rôle qui commence par le chef de culte est aléatoire, donc un culte ne signifierait pas automatiquement qu'il y a un apôtre.
Il me semble juste peu probable que j'aie été touché par un et qu'un deuxième se soit trouvé là pour voir et ait ensuite décidé de faire exactement la même chose à Jack.
What about the discussion of potentially 2 restrictions?On a more serious note, there was...ten (?) or so posts made by the time I decided to check in. Barring me commenting on each and every one for the sake of seeming busy, I dunno what BN expects. If I see something that piques my interest, I'll bring it up.
So far, the 'haha lets kill the king' was the most pressing thing to me.
I'm going to assume it's legit, since restrictions can and have targeted multiple players.What about the discussion of potentially 2 restrictions?
Where do you stand on that? If 1 were faking it, who do you think is the fake?
Only The Apostle has a limit of doing a restriction twice. Fool/Scorned can do it every day.I'm going to assume it's legit, since restrictions can and have targeted multiple players.
Between the two, though, I think if either of them were to fake it then it'd likely be Claws. If only because Foxxi posted first.
Though like I said, I think it's legit. An annoyance for them both (and anyone who can't understand French) but at least it's happening on D1 and not at a more critical point.
Well the downside of failing it also means nothing to some roles. So...but why would town willingly break the rules? So to me it just makes me think they are lying about it, I guess.
To be honest I don't think Foxxi is lying. I am like others and question claws. But again that doesn't mean he is scum either and could just be trolling.but why would town willingly break the rules? So to me it just makes me think they are lying about it, I guess.
Yeah, the fact void forgot to put in the king alignment odds wouldn't shock me if he forgot to say they couldn't mention it.To be honest I don't think Foxxi is lying. I am like others and question claws. But again that doesn't mean he is scum either and could just be trolling.
You are a cliche. Is my yard mowed yet?Honestly should've picked a better language, French is boring and cliche, why not elvish or klingon
chemin à parcourirÅh fuck my life I asked google translate to translate the french text and it translated the entire page to Swedish
noYou are a cliche. Is my yard mowed yet?
Better watch it mister, or i'll go back into the woods
La même raison pour laquelle je vote la plupart des gens à ce stade du jeu - pour voir ce qui se passe. Son ouverture était NAI. Cela signifie que je n'ai toujours aucun penchant pour lui dans aucune direction, alors pourquoi ne devrais-je pas essayer de générer plus d'informations ? Et l'avenir est toujours un peu flou, mais il y a eu assez de lui que j'ai aimé pour que je ne sois pas intéressé à le voir lynché aujourd'hui.?????
I agree that voting sleep and not doing anything has scum potential but didn't you argue that its NAI? So why vote him?
I also disagree on a potential Future lynch. He seems fluffy and active lurk to me
écraser ce garçonBetter watch it mister, or i'll go back into the woods
@MTR hail hydra?
Meh you want AC too much right now after a couple months in the woods.Better watch it mister, or i'll go back into the woods
No I am hunting scum this time around.mtr et morri scum ils ont encore fait la merde d'hydre
Really hot here. Heat advisory yet me and Future about to do a hike with scout troop. Frozen custard is part of it so that works out.Do you know how hot it is right now?
or rather Matthieyu and Morrison are decent votes.8. MTR
9. Matthieu
10. Mazer
11. Morrison
Vous vous rendez compte que la liste est par ordre alphabétique ? Robo est juste au sommet parce qu'il est King =Por rather Matthieyu and Morrison are decent votes.
but I thought that was funny
qui préféreriez-vous voir comme roi?he's not my king!
If he is a good king and you are BlueDragon, he is your king... or you low key saying you think he is bad? or you claimed to be bad/3p yourself?he's not my king!
he is getting the same scrutiny. Everyone will develop a read on him, but d1 isnt the best time to remove the king and blind vote someone new king. We at least need to have an idea of who can be trusted 1stit's like you got to that post and just stopped reading. I think my explanation in 178 is perfectly fine or do you not think so? One could argue that he's most likely town b/c he has a 60% chance of it but just going "oh 60% let's leave him alone!" is just lazy. He deserves the same scrutiny as everyone else. He's not getting lynched today and that's fine but I'm waiting on him to return. s1 is nearly over and it feels like we've gotten nowhere. Is a 2 page d1 common?
I played once and died n1Am I the only person who has never played this style before?
Is there a reason not to
Vote: Sleep
I don't believe that we've ever played together before, so how would you know if I'm a decent vote or not unless you're just following the crowd? I'm genuinely struggling to see what I have said this day phase that is even remotely controversial.or rather Matthieyu and Morrison are decent votes.
but I thought that was funny
I'm not sure that's how it works. True, I don't really know what your baseline play is (and I'm way too lazy to meta dive) Your first post just pings me a bit. Obviously, I'm not the first/only one saying this so if you want to believe/criticize me for agreeing with others instead of having the ability to form my own conclusions then that's up to you. If I thought you were the best vote I'd be voting you but I'm not.I don't believe that we've ever played together before, so how would you know if I'm a decent vote or not unless you're just following the crowd? I'm genuinely struggling to see what I have said this day phase that is even remotely controversial.
Unvote
Vote: Sleep
I'm going back to this. I don't see much point in randomly taking someone out under the guise of 'getting information' when it would be much more reliable to let those who can bring something to the table in terms of solid info unfettered.
I was a Cub Scout and never did Boy Scouts. Future is an eagle and we continue to help the troop. I am leading popcorn sales and trying really hard to pass the baton. Lol he was staffing camp hence the back and forth of living in the woods for the last couple months
Tonight is the annual hike for frozen custard from the park the troop meets at during the summer.
Sure man, whatever you need to tell yourself. This game seems a little complex so I'm not sure how reliable night actions will be. Also, think void kitten said that write-ups aren't going to have much information so when you say "im going to let this game be dictated by na's and write ups" all I hear is "let's put less emphasis on scumhunting/day phase."I don't think my post actually did 'ping' you so much as you're just letting BN's post saying the exact same thing dictate your judgement of me. Which is strange, since nothing I've said this day phase is remotely controversial and you seem to be ignoring that at least one player spoke up in my favour. Namely Xanjori. Nightingale voted for me, yes, though has since removed that vote.
If you have specific questions, ask them. It's too early for me to make any real judgement and I'd rather let night actions and write-ups dictate the direction of the game.
It's almost like I was placing emphasis upon the former element rather than the latter. Which, in turn, ties into my earlier question posed regarding whether claiming is allowed or not.Sure man, whatever you need to tell yourself. This game seems a little complex so I'm not sure how reliable night actions will be. Also, think void kitten said that write-ups aren't going to have much information so when you say "im going to let this game be dictated by na's and write ups" all I hear is "let's put less emphasis on scumhunting/day phase."
Maybe you could read the OP and see what the rules say about claimingIt's almost like I was placing emphasis upon the former element rather than the latter. Which, in turn, ties into my earlier question posed regarding whether claiming is allowed or not.
I wanted to see who was actually paying attention and willing to be helpful.Maybe you could read the OP and see what the rules say about claiming
vous, vous même, mazer, mme mazer, la maison de mazer vous le nommezJack, who are you most suspicious of beside me?
I don't remember us interacting much previously.