Fine... ill humor you...
See the thing is that if you were interested in "giving me any inclination that you are town and can be trusted" you are going to have to use your words and have a conversation but shutting down and going "nope!" is either really scummy or super unhelpful. but sure, let's talk about our interactions!
on d1 I said that Robo isn't my king and then I clarified that I distrusted him.
At that point on d1... nobody was aware of Robo's alignment. Sure his activity wasnt what anyone really wants to see of a player in the game, but thats sometimes how it goes. Your distrust was of someone that posted and disappeared. More then 1 person did this, but he was the only person that you distrusted for it, or at least stated distrust in.
You then, for some unknown reason, ignored that. I then lightly mocked/side eyed you with "It's like you got to that post and just stopped reading. I think my explanation in 178 is perfectly fine or do you not think so?" What you said earlier is that I was scummy for being combative at people for not agreeing with me and I fail to see how I'm being combative @ you when you weren't disagreeing with me?. Now maybe I was a bit annoyed that you ignored my explanation but that's not the same thing as getting mad at you for not agreeing with me.
all 178 said was you distrusted him more then you wanted him gone. While talking about how people have lives. I didnt ignore it. Was just more of the same think, distrust in the king.
You then followed it up with "d1 isn't the best time to remove the king and blind vote someone new king."
and like no one was suggesting that. My post literally said "He's not getting lynched today and that's fine" It's like you were talking at me but not actually paying attention to what was being said.
Still think d1 isnt the time in this game where you lynch the king. Doesnt matter if the king flips town or scum (unseen in our case). You would only want to eliminate a suspected bad king if you have an idea on someone that is either town or a neutral you can trust to put in place. This is something I also said in the 1st part of the day when we had the opportunity to vote for a new king and decided no king was a better play for us at the time.
Here's town Xan talking about how this could be scum posting from you. :)
Ask listo, mazer, satsu or anyone else playing if that is also something that comes from town!BN. They will say those comments are more or less NAI. Sure its possible for scum!BN, but not out of the realm for town!BN
I think being cheeky and voting sleep within half an hour of d2 starting was hilarious. I mean, maybe people felt like I was mocking them but that was never my intention.
You think its hilarious, I thought it disrespectful to the entire game saying we cant get a lynch off. You dont know the community, but decided based on 1 phase what you thought we would do. Its something that pinged me about your play.
I didn't really like your reply in 296 which basically said that I wasn't putting any effort into the game and just kinda ignoring my d1 contributions. Especially when you said "Is there anyone you are sus of?" and I was just kinda like *facepalm* Like I know you did say that you said my Morrison push was bad and ineffective, other than him being town, yes but the point was that I was actively using my voice and vote and its d1 so it's not like there's much to push on besides activity. So it felt pretty odd that you'd kinda act like I'd been doing none of that. I know you clarified/backtracked that it was ONLY about d2 but even then it just feels disjointed.
Actively using your voice on d1. These remarks were on D2. When you opened with sleep instead on putting pressure on someone you were sus of. Could have voted there and put for more effort into it when a lynch was possible. So what was it... were my remarks clarified or backtracked? In what way did they feel disjointed to you? If you say they were disjointed, why didnt you ask for further clarification from me at the time?
I mean maybe in some twisted reality you could say that I'm being combative with you b/c I'm not agreeing with the untrue things you are saying about me but you are also doing this weird goalpost move from "combative with people that don't agree with me." to "I don't like your interactions with you."
Let me make this clear, I dont like your interactions with me because they feel combative. My thoughts havent changed. Words may have shifted slightly, but the same feel is there for me. I dont like your play. Sure, combative might not have been the best description. But when you say things like "in some twisted reality" doesnt give me the warm fuzzy that you are taking people seriously in their views or opinions.