He needs to go though and not just give him a pass like we tend to do. No speed yeet needed I agree. It looks like we potentially have info.Either way, we should make sure to let people check in and not speed yeet future
Because the first game I decide to end our game relationship and break up with him, he flips red. In the same day, also gets 4 votes added to him leading to his yeet. His reaction was clearly genuine. The new rule was likely true and it got him yeeted. Then gets resurrected, but is already flipped as scum.why is Future being scum so funny?
I like this. A little annoyed you came out with it so quickly because I wanted to see who might try to give me cred for Future of which there should be none.Also, the only person on future yeet 1.0 that I feel should get any cred for being on that train is Val. VK would absolutely vote a partner there for later cred, Grumpy wanted to go for CWE or MTR and didn't even mention future, only voting once it seemed like future would be the only possible yeet -( though I should go look at the exact timing, if Grumpy could have feasibly voted someone else that may have nudged it from future then maybe small points here), and psycho's vote wasn't actually needed since future was far enough in the lead close enough to EoD that it would be unlikely for him not to be the yeet. My vote on him didn't really matter either really, I was just hoping we'd reach majority and avoid that penalty. Though now I'm not sure if there actually is a penalty or if that's just more bastardness from Mazer
This is the path I always typically go and it either works or it backfires. His role was Scum Deceiver. If scum expect him to be blocked, they could use a protect which most teams usually have one of. Barring confirmed info, I wouldn't want to flip anyone without getting rid of Future first. But like, its not a hill I'd die on and would consider another.let me play devil's advocate here. We know Future is scum, and flipping him does guarantee that he's not able to use his action but towwn had a roleblock or something should we consider flipping someone else or is it not worth the risk in a game thats going to be solved through write ups/night actions?
I disagree this is like last games psycho sk debaclelet me play devil's advocate here. We know Future is scum, and flipping him does guarantee that he's not able to use his action but towwn had a roleblock or something should we consider flipping someone else or is it not worth the risk in a game thats going to be solved through write ups/night actions?
The only way I would be on board with this is IF we had info on another scumlet me play devil's advocate here. We know Future is scum, and flipping him does guarantee that he's not able to use his action but towwn had a roleblock or something should we consider flipping someone else or is it not worth the risk in a game thats going to be solved through write ups/night actions?
One scum in the focus group was already discovered. Others are clear. Its a law.I kinda want to train up grumpy with future and see what happens honestly
Vote: GrumpyCat
YesWait... Mazer said majority is 10 but we didn't hit majority yesterday, wouldn't it be 9 now then?
If they have a motivator of sorts, it would go off before a RBa protect (doctor?) nullifies a roleblock? what is this witchcraft?!?
is it j-law?Its a law.
can we get a vote count
Updated
The Rajah originating mods tend to be slightly scum heavier. If it were my game, I'd do 6 if I had like a SK or murdery neutral. 7 if I didn't or there was decent killing power.how many scum are there in a 23 player? I would think 5-6 but it is role madness and me not really understanding what is considered balanced on this site. Or is this not even something I should be worried about as the game will resolve on its on?
Also this. Some games are beyond what anyone would considered balance and they typically end up pretty even.WhAt iS BaLaNcE
Doesn't this bring us to 20 players, requiring 11 to lynch, therefore needing 10?GAME EVENT:
A powerful force looked out from their Hollywood Mansion. They had not yet made their presence felt. They scoffed at the notions of good evil. What they cared about was entertainment.
They decided to bring Future back into the game.
Without checking, it's typically 25-33% non town (so 6-8 in this game). And we've got our inactivity killer, whether its mod or player controlled I do not know.The Rajah originating mods tend to be slightly scum heavier. If it were my game, I'd do 6 if I had like a SK or murdery neutral. 7 if I didn't or there was decent killing power.
Isn't listo right? Future coming back would move it up to 11, and then drop it back to 10?Future (3)- vk,bn, dreyski
grumpy (1) -nighty
Hammer is at 9
I mean he counted Dreyski's vote after Listo asked and specifically said hammer was 9, so I assume some fuckery.Isn't listo right? Future coming back would move it up to 11, and then drop it back to 10?
I mean thats possible I guess, but what were the odds Xan would be chosen for kill over like LDG. I guess its WIFOM on whomever has the action though.Maybe they wanted to take Listo out by inactivity vig shot on Xan?
Thats kinda a shot in the dark with the amount of non actives but maybeMaybe they wanted to take Listo out by inactivity vig shot on Xan?
Doesn't this bring us to 20 players, requiring 11 to lynch, therefore needing 10?
Hammer is at 9Isn't listo right? Future coming back would move it up to 11, and then drop it back to 10?
This is not an impossible narrative... but why are you focused on him specifically? What do you think about me, grumpy, psycho? Why did you completely ignore Val? Ngl - this kinda reeks of an agenda to push the idea there's another scum on that train since you aren't bothering to actually look at the whole train and just seem to have picked a person to declare is susAlso meant to say Void is already leading the charge on the Future vote again. He'd definitely want to control the narrative and guide town that way.
this part makes me feel like it was a 3rd partyThey scoffed at the notions of good evil. What they cared about was entertainment.
How do you feel about grumpy not including future in his original vote choice, or offering to swap to someone else if they reached 7 instead?You might not be Void. I didn't really expect a "Oh you got me" reply. Just things bouncing around my brain and thought I'd share.
Psycho's vote was literally right at EoD and it wasn't going to (clearly) make us reach maj - it ultimately made zero differenceIt is also not unnecessary to vote. Without hitting hammer, majority is reduced.
What benefit would scum Psycho hope to get from that vote then? I get its ultimately pointless, but why then?Psycho's vote was literally right at EoD and it wasn't going to (clearly) make us reach maj - it ultimately made zero difference
No clue. I don't honestly see a reason for the vote no matter what alignment he is.What benefit would scum Psycho hope to get from that vote then? I get its ultimately pointless, but why then?
Maybe just to get put on record of where he wanted at EoD? I can see the questioning of it, but it felt strange framed as inherently negative.No clue. I don't honestly see a reason for the vote no matter what alignment he is.
I mostly concentrated on Void because of how he played Vince and just seemed that surrounding actions were mostly feeding my thought on Void.Sorry, you did mention his name, but like me it was just to note we were there
Why wouldn't mafia revive mafia? Would mafia rather revive town? It could have been a scum action designed to waste a day phase for town having to eliminate a known scum again.its not really impossible that Void votes his buddy to distance but I don't think mafia revived mafia. The "town" thing to do is vote Future so Void would still have to.
Why even put that in a game? There are so many other ways to waste a day than giving scum a rez that will only be used to rez a teammate. Granted, I don't think we have ever seen rezzes after flips before so its new territory.Why wouldn't mafia revive mafia? Would mafia rather revive town? It could have been a scum action designed to waste a day phase for town having to eliminate a known scum again.
The fact that the person responsible for the resurrection is hidden doesn't strike me as town friendly.
A desire for pure chaos.Why even put that in a game?
Remember, this is a thing.This will be a Role Madness game. Which will include a bit of devilry (wink, wink).
There are but why not? Why resurrect the scum? To watch town go through the process again. The whole thing seems designed to fuck with town (Mazerrrrr!). At most town chases their tails with different theories. The least we waste D2 voting Future again.Why even put that in a game? There are so many other ways to waste a day than giving scum a rez that will only be used to rez a teammate. Granted, I don't think we have ever seen rezzes after flips before so its new territory.
Since you clearly didn't read my other post...the way its written makes me think the revive came from 3rd party. Maybe its just mafia the wrote it that way to throw us off or the mod himself is trying to throw us for a loop. You might be right that Void is scum and was distancing from Future but the revive might not be from him.Why wouldn't mafia revive mafia? Would mafia rather revive town? It could have been a scum action designed to waste a day phase for town having to eliminate a known scum again.
The fact that the person responsible for the resurrection is hidden doesn't strike me as town friendly.
going with my 3rd party theory, resurrecting scum (assuming that scum is lynched) guarantees safety and doesn't really advance the game state.Why resurrect the scum?
Yes I understood that the revive could be 3rd party. I never ruled that out.Since you clearly didn't read my other post...the way its written makes me think the revive came from 3rd party. Maybe its just mafia the wrote it that way to throw us off or the mod himself is trying to throw us for a loop. You might be right that Void is scum and was distancing from Future but the revive might not be from him.
Exactly. Better said than I did.How does resing scum help a 3p tho specially early on i could maybe see that late game as a survival tactic
It's a long way to go and they've painted themselves as a scum helper. It just doesn't make sense.going with my 3rd party theory, resurrecting scum (assuming that scum is lynched) guarantees safety and doesn't really advance the game state.
It has us chasing our tails, possibly getting town to finger each other and ultimately makes us eliminate Future again. It could be a hoax like Night said, Future could be a scum stump that won't be eliminated if we vote there. Either way a whole day phase vote down the tubes. The day vote is our most powerful asset. Wasting it helps scum.I'm not saying that it has to be. Just that the flavor could be interpreted as not mafia. Ultimately it doesn't really matter though. You could just argue Occams and say it was scum but I don't see how it helps them that much either.
Are you kidding me?GAME EVENT:
A powerful force looked out from their Hollywood Mansion. They had not yet made their presence felt. They scoffed at the notions of good evil. What they cared about was entertainment.
They decided to bring Future back into the game.
Assuming Future was bussed, it would have been closer/near EoD so from the voter order. I'd trust the early Future voters as town more than the late voters on the Future train.Why bus FH at all? He was such an easy save. Sleep vote was perfectly reasonable choice for yesterday. Scum could easily pile on sleep vote and they wouldnt be considered scummy even if fh died later on. For me at least.
Literally Mazer posted vote Count at 2:39 before time is up.Assuming Future was bussed, it would have been closer/near EoD so from the voter order. I'd trust the early Future voters as town more than the late voters on the Future train.
I will say Void being on Future before the 4 votes makes me wary. If they are both red it could have been harmless scum on scum vote coverage at first but after the votes it would make jumping off seem weird on Void's part when Future pops red. Also knowing Future is cooked Void's smart enough to stay on that train knowing he can point out he voted Future before the votes and he'd have that street cred.
Fair question but no. I am town. I'm so quiet as scum, I've never been accused of being scum with TMI posting.I'm trying to figure out if Jarrod making sense is because they're figuring things out as town, or if they're mafia with TMI on what happened N1 events surrounding Future.
Personally I think that would have been more viable if more people had voted sleep. It had like 3 votes iirc , and future had like 7 votes before the votes I and psycho cast. It would have taken four votes at that point just to *tie* -- I don't see any world in which scum pile onto sleep to save future unless some other town also did. Future was even one of those three on sleep already. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if Matt or MTR is also scum since I would expect *some* other scum to have tried to nudge it that way.Bussing early generally doesnt happen early around here not that it couldnt but its just not used alot this early your more likely to see a fumble from sum1 trying to save the lynch but we didnt .
i agree with grumpy on the one fact scum could of all voted sleep so im a bit confused here It may have been different if future took sum1 with him in a 1 for 1
I usually go that route but kept my vote on Badger. I like that itchy sonofagun.Who all are usually the ND1L4L crowd? Who usually always votes sleep but didn't?
I'm guessing they'd argue someone altered their flip.I'd really like to hear from Future just to see what they think but expect radio silence.
Claims aren't allowed in this gameDoes anyone want to claim any of the night deaths? I'll take any non-claims as evidence we have a serial killer in the game.
They aren't?Claims aren't allowed in this game
I mean we aren't allowed to claim this game?They aren't?
Oh right.Do not claim roles or breadcrumb. I will kill you way faster than voidkitten.
This would assume that I would consider that I'd have cred in a situation like that. It gives me no cred to have stayed on Future.I will say Void being on Future before the 4 votes makes me wary. If they are both red it could have been harmless scum on scum vote coverage at first but after the votes it would make jumping off seem weird on Void's part when Future pops red. Also knowing Future is cooked Void's smart enough to stay on that train knowing he can point out he voted Future before the votes and he'd have that street cred.
I postulated this earlier. I am leaning the former.I'm trying to figure out if Jarrod making sense is because they're figuring things out as town, or if they're mafia with TMI on what happened N1 events surrounding Future.