He's not wrong. You dont really try that hard or that often.Projection
do you think mazer actually randed or gave the house specific roles?
you need to save me from myself i restarted a new char in mhw and its horrible
Including mixing marration perspectives and using Yorkshire accent for effect, I see.VoidKitten has much experience with speaking in specific ways, I promise thee.
Yes, but an early placeholder vote is also insurance against some mod bastardry or unforseen circumstances.There are 11 votes required there is got to be switching.
He scares me. In a good way. Obviously I'm not on his level.What do you think about Void?
How about 3pups? Or Satsu or Blind for that matter?He scares me. In a good way. Obviously I'm not on his level.
In this game, you mean? I've seen nothing of concern. Prodding here and there, trading swipes with the mod. Probably fairly standard D1 stuff?
No feels on Future yet. He's maybe a bit more present than I'd expect from scum Future at this point, but too early to tell.D1 BN is BN. Trolling/getting trolled by LDG, and prodding/voting for low contributors after placing a Mathhieu vote. Pretty NAI.
3pups is a slight town lean at this point. Is aware enough of post requirements that hamper his usual 'Grandpa Simpson' style shows he's willing to contribute despite it not being his forte. Hopefully we'll learn more when he's more available.
Satsu I'll need to run an ISO on.
While we're asking questions,: what do you think of Claws and Future?
I disagree. You are mafia.Satsu - posts 169-170 raise an eyebrow, but nothing more. If the Matthieu train spirals out of control, then it might worth taking a further look.
MaybeI assume scum had some kind of force hammer mechanic that they used to kill Diva.
Lucifer reads like town Back up that inherited Diva's role
And there I was thinking you were on the side of good, I had nothing to do with this. The only people with motive would be the other members of the house.I disagree. You are mafia.
Vote: Dreyski
That would be worst case if Diva was 1-shot and Lucifer gained nothingMaybe
Maybe Diva shot and hit town and died because of that
This is exactly what mafia would say.And there I was thinking you were on the side of good, I had nothing to do with this. The only people with motive would be the other members of the house.
At least we know we'll get some flips this game.
Just hit me that usually one shot vigs that die if they miss are called desperados typically so I guess that can make the argument stronger for this being a day kill by scum or third party but still seems weird and out of place.
If mafia had a targeted kill I really don't think they would have used it on Diva.If it is a scum day kill then it does seem unusual to use it at this stage. Seems like it would have been better to have held onto it until someone became a threat (ie became too "trusted" by town) and trying to NK that player would come with the risk of being blocked or watched.
If I'm defensive it's because you couldn't be more wrong about this. Or am I not supposed to react to you throwing a random vote at me because reasons?To be clear my argument isn't that Dreyski chose to kill Diva. I'm assuming it was a collective decision and I don't care whatsoever to speculate about who would and wouldn't be okay with the shot. This isn't the point. But Dreyski's defensiveness about the subject is what ishas triggered my suspicion here.
There are a number of ways you could react to a vote. Some of them I would even find towny. For example, you could try to clarify my reasons, and then respond to the accusation more reasonably. What you did was 1) Immediately accuse me of not being on the side of good for voting you; 2) State your "aliby" and try to redirect the focus onto other members of the House (which doesn't really mean anything for reasons I outlined above). It looks like fight or flight to me. It looks fishy.If I'm defensive it's because you couldn't be more wrong about this. Or am I not supposed to react to you throwing a random vote at me because reasons?
Or do you have anything substantive to link me to mafia? Because if not, stand down.
How often does the mafia have a daykill? If it was a kill leading vote getter and a mafia ability, it would typically end the day. Not kill one and let the day continue.This isn't a murder mystery game. This is a mafia game. Mafia killed Diva because Diva was a part of the opposing team. They need no other motive. You acting like this isn't the case seems disingenious and also exactly why you would choose this kill. There is no connection which is why you could make the argument you have just made for why you in particular wouldn't shoot Diva.
I agree with this. Scum wouldnt shoot LHF that isnt on their team. They would kill someone coming after them. A loud town voice or potential TPRIf it is a scum day kill then it does seem unusual to use it at this stage. Seems like it would have been better to have held onto it until someone became a threat (ie became too "trusted" by town) and trying to NK that player would come with the risk of being blocked or watched.
So you go from "this was a scum kill" to "my best guess is x ability"If mafia had a targeted kill I really don't think they would have used it on Diva.
My best guess is they had the ability to either kill the exact spot between the leading wagons or a random wagon among the top vote getters.
Leads me back to multiple 1x vig... with potential for them to act during the day. Really doesnt feel like a scum ability.Most disappointing is that they picked someone who gives us no info. Which makes it more likely it was some kind of scum kill.
Hard for someone to "Clarify your reasons" if they dont agree with your view.There are a number of ways you could react to a vote. Some of them I would even find towny. For example, you could try to clarify my reasons, and then respond to the accusation more reasonably. What you did was 1) Immediately accuse me of not being on the side of good for voting you; 2) State your "aliby" and try to redirect the focus onto other members of the House (which doesn't really mean anything for reasons I outlined above). It looks like fight or flight to me. It looks fishy.
VK being a dead fish... CFD?and then theres vk in the shadows doing nothin like a dead fish
I think a scum action to early hammer would end the daywe could also it may not be a day kill it could of just been a early event hammer
i actually like mitch enough to not d1 him he is usually a man of action and im willing to give him the day he also could be a jesterVote: Mitch
Is this a 'Visit'?Clause was more determined than ever to save this weird family, save Christmas, and then go back to the Past, so he could finish signing up for FOS. He was a little worried about the sign-up error his wife had made, but he could fix that anytime. But it was still something to think about. He needed to paralyze his enemies with fear. He a true detainment clause. Or maybe an escape clause for good? It was difficult to say, so he went to ask Matt for his thoughts on branding.
Didnt he do first action on top? With all that players? Not sure what that was supposed to do, i am not in there. Whats weird for a backup role if you ask me.It looks like scum have a role that can use the abilities of dead players which they used to kill 3puppies with Diva's shot.
Lucifer may have holstered, by the looks of it.
Doesnt look like there is 3p related anything. Thats some lazy ass 3p ;pIt doesn't look like there was a 3p related kill last night.
Not only who but what even for.The real question I have about this night post is - who would protect Tildey last night?
or do you mean n1? Well that char looks very green.char listo is likely scum who tf blocks me d1
Didnt Psycho think you were towny? You shouldnt randomly vote people that are good for you. Thats rude.Hm need to get the ball rolling with a random Vote: Psycho
Yes, thats a visit.Is this a 'Visit'?
My Lucifer=backup theory comes from Diva's death write-up, where it says that Lucifer's eyes lit up with power upon Maze dying. I read the first paragraph of tonight's write-up as fluff.Didnt he do first action on top? With all that players? Not sure what that was supposed to do, i am not in there. Whats weird for a backup role if you ask me.
Yeah not all that much to say right now.I'm curious why you would say you are not one of the characters mentioned in that paragraph. That feels a bit too loose lipped to me. Are you finding yourself short on things to say right now, Satsu?
Mazer likkes to do limited writeups, with viewable actions determined by RNG/dice roll. I'm guessing Lucifer rolled high.Didnt he do first action on top? With all that players? Not sure what that was supposed to do, i am not in there. Whats weird for a backup role if you ask me.
Could be CWE via cannibal kill? or an EN 3p, or indeed, a lazy ass 3pDoesnt look like there is 3p related anything. Thats some lazy ass 3p ;p
Are we just going based on what Val said? A lot of those actions seem very ambiguous.or do you mean n1? Well that char looks very green.
You mean whole paragraph or Vals interpretation ?At leasat one is straight up wrong
Can someone translate this for me. What does docced mean?Character Jackie Daytona docced Tildey
I would say yesIs this a 'Visit'?
I find it hard to believe you dont understand what a doc action would be...Can someone translate this for me. What does docced mean?
At least one of the interpretations in that paragraph, I'm certain.You mean whole paragraph or Vals interpretation ?
My working theory is that he made all our actions 'visible' in the writeup. Which could work to our advantage because that list of names should contain up to four mafia members (Mab, MTR, Not Suspicious Future, Gentleman John Marcone)So Lucifer did something to Psych, Void, me, Tildey, Future, llettuce, Dreyski, 3pups and Morrison or I am reading that wrong?
Daytona doc'ed Tildey
I would never have spelt it that way. That is why I was confused.I find it hard to believe you dont understand what a doc action would be...
From that statement, it looks like Val believes Jackie Dayton performed the doc action on Tildey.
That's... An interesting thought actuallyMy working theory is that he made all our actions 'visible' in the writeup. Which could work to our advantage because that list of names should contain up to four mafia members (Mab, MTR, Not Suspicious Future, Gentleman John Marcone)